lib/ureq
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

1.0.0

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Martin Algesten
2020-05-06 13:57:01 +02:00
parent 49b6072921
commit bbfd125025
2 changed files with 26 additions and 18 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Cargo.toml
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[package] [package]
name = "ureq" name = "ureq"
version = "0.12.1" version = "1.0.0"
authors = ["Martin Algesten <martin@algesten.se>"] authors = ["Martin Algesten <martin@algesten.se>"]
description = "Minimal HTTP request library" description = "Minimal HTTP request library"
license = "MIT/Apache-2.0" license = "MIT/Apache-2.0"

42
README.md
View File

@@ -6,23 +6,6 @@
> Minimal request library in rust. > Minimal request library in rust.
## ureq's future
I asked for feedback on [ureq's future
direction](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/eu6qg8/future_of_ureq_http_client_library/)
and came to the conclusion that there's enough interest in a simple
blocking http client to keep it going. Another motivation is that I
use it extensively for my own work, to talk to S3.
I'll keep maintaining ureq. I will try to keep dependencies somewhat
fresh and try to address bad bugs. I will however not personally
implement new features in ureq, but I do welcome PR with open arms.
The code base is extremely simple, one might even call naive. It's a
good project to hack on as first learning experience in Rust. I will
uphold some base line of code hygiene, but won't block a PR due to
something being a bit inelegant.
## Usage ## Usage
```rust ```rust
@@ -47,6 +30,31 @@ fn main() {
} }
``` ```
## About 1.0.0
This crate is now 1.x.x. I signifies there will be no more breaking
API changes (for better or worse). I personally use this code in
production system reading data from AWS. Whether the quality is good
enough for other use cases is a "YMMV". I know the Agent related code
is rather undertested and probably has issues.
## ureq's future
I asked for feedback on [ureq's future
direction](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/eu6qg8/future_of_ureq_http_client_library/)
and came to the conclusion that there's enough interest in a simple
blocking http client to keep it going. Another motivation is that I
use it extensively for my own work, to talk to S3.
I'll keep maintaining ureq. I will try to keep dependencies somewhat
fresh and try to address bad bugs. I will however not personally
implement new features in ureq, but I do welcome PR with open arms.
The code base is extremely simple, one might even call naive. It's a
good project to hack on as first learning experience in Rust. I will
uphold some base line of code hygiene, but won't block a PR due to
something being a bit inelegant.
## Features ## Features
To enable a minimal dependency tree, some features are off by default. To enable a minimal dependency tree, some features are off by default.